|
|
|
|
|
| Daniel Schober; James Malone; Robert Stevens. |
| Creation of an ontology according to some common plan is best accomplished collaboratively. This is sometimes contradicted by the distribution of the ontology’s developers. An obvious solution therefore is to build collaboration into ontology development tools. Such support necessarily includes both the technical means to perform editing operations upon an ontology, but also support for the communication that makes collaboration such a vital part of much ontology development. To investigate the distributed, collaborative ontology engineering process and the corresponding capabilities of the Collaborative Protege 3 (CP) tool, members of the OntoGenesis network came together and enriched the Ontology of Biomedical Investigations (OBI) with new... |
| Tipo: Manuscript |
Palavras-chave: Bioinformatics. |
| Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3517/version/1 |
| |
|
|
| Jesualdo Tomas Fernandez-Breis; Mikel Egaña Aranguren; Robert Stevens. |
| Over the past few years the number of bio-ontologies has rapidly increased. The evaluation of ontologies has long been a problematic issue. The growing number of ontologies makes the need for a strategy for evaluating quality more urgent. We propose a framework for evaluating the quality of bio-ontologies. This framework is inspired by a well-known software quality standard, which has been adapted to the needs of ontology evaluation. An example of how to use the framework, comparing two versions of the Open Biomedical Ontologies' Cell Type Ontology, is included as an illustration. |
| Tipo: Manuscript |
Palavras-chave: Bioinformatics. |
| Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3479/version/1 |
| |
|
|
| Alexander Garcia; Kieran O’Neill; Leyla J. Garcia; Phillip Lord; Robert Stevens; Oscar Corcho; Frank Gibson. |
| This paper addresses two research questions: “How should a well-engineered methodology facilitate the development of ontologies within communities of practice?” and “What methodology should be used?” If ontologies are to be developed by communities then the ontology development life cycle should be better understood within this context. This paper presents the Melting Point (MP), a proposed new methodology for developing ontologies within decentralized settings. It describes how MP was developed by taking best practices from other methodologies, provides details on recommended steps and recommended processes, and compares MP with alternatives. The methodology presented here is the product of direct first-hand... |
| Tipo: Manuscript |
Palavras-chave: Bioinformatics. |
| Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3231/version/1 |
| |
|
|
| Jesualdo Tomas Fernandez-Breis; Mikel Egaña Aranguren; Robert Stevens. |
| Over the past few years the number of bio-ontologies has rapidly increased. The evaluation of ontologies has long been a problematic issue. The growing number of ontologies makes the need for a strategy for evaluating quality more urgent. We propose a framework for evaluating the quality of bio-ontologies. This framework is inspired by a well-known software quality standard, which has been adapted to the needs of ontology evaluation. An example of how to use the framework, comparing two versions of the Open Biomedical Ontologies' Cell Type Ontology, is included as an illustration. |
| Tipo: Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Bioinformatics. |
| Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3478/version/1 |
| |
|
|
| Daniel Schober; James Malone; Robert Stevens. |
| Creation of an ontology according to some common plan is best accomplished collaboratively. This is sometimes contradicted by the distribution of the ontology’s developers. An obvious solution therefore is to build collaboration into ontology development tools. Such support necessarily includes both the technical means to perform editing operations upon an ontology, but also support for the communication that makes collaboration such a vital part of much ontology development. To investigate the distributed, collaborative ontology engineering process and the corresponding capabilities of the Collaborative Protege 3 (CP) tool, members of the OntoGenesis network came together and enriched the Ontology of Biomedical Investigations (OBI) with new... |
| Tipo: Manuscript |
Palavras-chave: Bioinformatics. |
| Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3517/version/2 |
| |
|
|
| Erick Antezana; Vladimir Mironov; Mikel Egana; Robert Stevens; Ward Blondé; Bernard De Baets; Martin Kuiper. |
| The Cell Cycle Ontology (CCO) is an application ontology that automatically captures and integrates detailed knowledge on the cell cycle process by combining, interlinking and enriching knowledge from various sources. CCO uses Semantic Web technologies, and it is accessible via the web for browsing, visualising, advanced querying, and computational reasoning. CCO facilitates a detailed analysis of cell cycle related molecular network components. Through querying and automated reasoning, it may provide new hypotheses to help steer a systems biology approach to biological network building. The ontology is available on "http://www.cellcycleontology.org":http://www.cellcycleontology.org. Visual exploration can be done via the BioPortal, the... |
| Tipo: Poster |
Palavras-chave: Genetics & Genomics; Bioinformatics. |
| Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3563/version/1 |
| |
|
|
| Mikel Egaña Aranguren; Robert Stevens; Erick Antezana. |
| As ontologies are developed there is a common need to transform them, especially from those that are axiomatically lean to those that are axiomatically rich. Such transformations often require large numbers of axioms to be generated that affect many different parts of the ontology. This paper describes the Ontology Pre-Processor Language (OPPL), a domain-specific macro language, based in the Manchester OWL Syntax, for manipulating ontologies written in OWL. OPPL instructions can add/remove entities, and add/remove axioms (semantics or annotations) to/from entities in an OWL ontology. OPPL is suitable for applying the same change to different ontologies or at different development stages, and for keeping track of the changes made (e.g. in pipelines). It is... |
| Tipo: Manuscript |
Palavras-chave: Biotechnology; Bioinformatics. |
| Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/4006/version/1 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
