Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Ordenar por: 

RelevânciaAutorTítuloAnoImprime registros no formato resumido
Registros recuperados: 3
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems Ecology and Society
Binder, Claudia R.; University of Munich; claudia.binder@lmu.de; Hinkel, Jochen; Global Climate Forum e.V. (GCF) Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; hinkel@globalclimateforum.org; Bots, Pieter W. G.; Delft University of Technology; P.W.G.Bots@tudelft.nl.
In this paper we compare 10 established frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. We limited ourselves to frameworks that were explicitly designed to be used by a wider community of researchers and practitioners. Although all these frameworks seem to have emerged from the need for concepts that permit structured, interdisciplinary reasoning about complex problems in social-ecological systems, they differ significantly with respect to contextual and structural criteria, such as conceptualization of the ecological and social systems and their interrelation. It appears that three main criteria suffice to produce a classification of frameworks that may be used as a decision tree when choosing a framework for analysis. These criteria are (i) whether a...
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports Palavras-chave: Anthropocentric; Conceptualization; Decision tree; Dynamics; Ecocentric; Ecological system; Framework; Human-environment systems; Social-ecological systems; Social system.
Ano: 2013
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Linking Land Change with Driving Forces and Actors: Four Conceptual Models Ecology and Society
Hersperger, Anna M.; Land Use Dynamics Unit, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL; anna.hersperger@wsl.ch; Gennaio, Maria-Pia; Swiss Federal Research Institute Agroscope ART; maria.gennaio@art.admin.ch; Verburg, Peter H.; Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam ; peter.verburg@ivm.vu.nl.
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports Palavras-chave: Conceptualization; Guidelines; Land change modeling; Land cover change; Land use; Model selection; Organizational heuristic.
Ano: 2010
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Forest owner representation of forest management and perception of resource efficiency: a structural equation modeling study Ecology and Society
Ficko, Andrej; University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources; andrej.ficko@bf.uni-lj.si; Boncina, Andrej; University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources; andrej.boncina@bf.uni-lj.si.
Underuse of nonindustrial private forests in developed countries has been interpreted mostly as a consequence of the prevailing noncommodity objectives of their owners. Recent empirical studies have indicated a correlation between the harvesting behavior of forest owners and the specific conceptualization of appropriate forest management described as “nonintervention” or “hands-off” management. We aimed to fill the huge gap in knowledge of social representations of forest management in Europe and are the first to be so rigorous in eliciting forest owner representations in Europe. We conducted 3099 telephone interviews with randomly selected forest owners in Slovenia, asking them whether they thought they managed...
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports Palavras-chave: Attitudes; Conceptualization; Management concepts; Natural resources; Private forest owners; Social representations theory; Timber supply; Values.
Ano: 2015
Registros recuperados: 3
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional