|
|
|
|
|
Ngangjoh H., Yenkong. |
While the benefits of preferential trade agreements granted by the European Communities to the ACP countries have been lauded, the efficiency of such preferences in achieving the underpinning objectives of the preferences has also been contested in some quarters. Whenever multilateral trade negotiations move towards reducing most-favoured-nation tariffs, countries benefiting from trade preferences are concerned over the impact the reductions will have on such preferences. The debates over the value of preferences seem recently to have intensified due to a number of complaints brought before the WTO dispute settlement system that challenge the legality of the preferences or other measures linked to the preferences. Though it places some emphasis on the... |
Tipo: Journal Article |
Palavras-chave: Appellate Body; Dispute settlement; Enabling Clause; Panel; Sugar Protocol; Trade preferences; WTO; International Relations/Trade. |
Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/23898 |
| |
|
|
Froese, Marc D.. |
This article examines Canadas softwood lumber dispute with the United States in the context of new juridical models of international dispute settlement and an evolving trade policy environment in North America. Two questions are of central importance to this study. First, what does the rise of contingent protection measures mean for Canadas regulatory model? Strong antidumping legislation has created a new order of trade conflict at a time when intrasectoral competition has increased state support in a number of sectors. Second, how do American antidumping trade remedy measures come to bear in this dispute? In the softwood case, dispute settlement has been less effective because Canada, as the smaller economy, faces the challenge of enforcing panel... |
Tipo: Journal Article |
Palavras-chave: Antidumping; Countervailing duties; Dispute settlement; Softwood; Trade policy; WTO; International Relations/Trade. |
Ano: 2006 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/23844 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|