|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Saxena, K. G.; Jawaharlal Nehru University; kgsaxena@jnuniv.ernet.in; Rao, K.S.; CISHME, University of Delhi, South Campus, New Delhi-17, India; srkottapalli@yahoo.com; Sen, K. K. C; G. B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development;; Maikhuri, R. K.; G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development; rkmaikhuri@yahoo.com; Semwal, R. L.; ;. |
| Losses of forest cover, biodiversity, agricultural productivity, and ecosystem services in the Himalayan mountain region are interlinked problems and threats to the sustainable livelihoods of 115 x 106 mountain people as well as the inhabitants of the adjoining Indo-gangetic plains. Until the 1970s, environmental conservation, food security, and rural economic development were treated as independent sectors. The poor outcomes of sector-oriented approaches catalyzed efforts to address environmental and socioeconomic problems concurrently. The identification of "key" natural resource management interventions is an important dimension of integrated management. Projects to rehabilitate the degraded lands that cover 40% of the Indian Himalaya could be key... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Bamboo; Community decision making; Himalaya; India; Integrated natural resource management; Land rehabilitation; Medicinal plants; Reforestation; Village.. |
| Ano: 2001 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| van Noordwijk, Meine; International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, ICRAF SE Asia; M.van-noordwijk@cgiar.org; Tomich, Thomas P; Alternatives to Slash and Burn (ASB), World Agroforestry Centre; t.tomich@cgiar.org; Verbist, Bruno; ; B.Verbist@cgiar.org. |
| Natural resource management research has to evolve from a focus on plans, maps, and regulations to an acknowledgment of the complex, sometimes chaotic, reality in the field, with a large number of actors making their own decisions. As outside actors, we can only try to facilitate and support a process of negotiation among the stakeholders. Such negotiation involves understanding the perspectives of all stakeholders, analyzing complementarities in views, identifying where differences may be settled by “science,” where science and social action can bring innovative alternatives for reconciliation, and where compromises will be necessary to move ahead. We distinguish between natural resource management problems at village level, within... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Indonesia; Adaptive learning; Adaptive options; Agroforests; Integrated natural resource management; Land-use change scenarios; Negotiation support models; Quantitative impact assessments; Scaling rules; Stakeholders; Sustainability assessments; Tropical forest margins. |
| Ano: 2001 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Lovell, Chris; Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; c&c.lovell@xtra.co.nz; Mandondo, Alois; ; mandondo@africaonline.co.zw; Moriarty, Patrick; ; moriarty@irc.nl. |
| Lessons from integrated natural resource management (INRM) practiced at different scales are reviewed, with a focus on catchment management. INRM is complex, and many interactions have to be addressed. Consequently, the scale of investigation can restrict the generality and utility of the findings. Examples show that temporal, biophysical, and institutional scales can each be critical. Contexts and dynamics associated with particular scales, and interactions or lateral flows that become important with increasing scale, also pose serious challenges. A conceptual framework is presented for scaling issues in INRM and how to deal with them. To benefit many people over large areas within sensible time frames requires considerable political will, investment, and... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Common property management; Community-based natural resource management; Devolution; Going to scale; Integrated catchment management; Integrated natural resource management; Integrated water resource management; Participatory watershed development; Scaling-out; Scaling-up; Spatial scale; Temporal scale. |
| Ano: 2002 |
|
| |
|
|
| Levrel, Harold; Bouamrane, M. |
| Co-adaptive management of biodiversity is largely based on a collective learning process. This collective learning concerns "instrumental policy learning," "social policy learning," and " political learning." This paper focuses on instrumental policy learning that has been launched in four West African biosphere reserves. It is based on a MAB-UNESCO/UNEP-GEF programme concerning the co-construction of interaction indicators (between development and conservation), inspired by the Integrated Natural Resource Management (INRM) methodology. Using this process, we were able to test conventional Pressure-State-Response indicators, highlight their limitations, and develop new indicators starting from stakeholders' stories and perceptions. These new indicators can... |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Local knowledge; Instrumental learning; Interaction indicators; Integrated natural resource management; Biosphere reserves. |
| Ano: 2008 |
URL: http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/2008/publication-5290.pdf |
| |
|
|
|
