Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Ordenar por: 

RelevânciaAutorTítuloAnoImprime registros no formato resumido
Registros recuperados: 4
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Perpetual private land conservation: the case for outdoor recreation and functional leisure Ecology and Society
Farmer, James R.; Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Studies, Indiana University; School of Public Health, Indiana University; Ostrom Workshop, Indiana University ; jafarmer@indiana.edu; Brenner, Jacob C.; Ithaca College; jbrenner@ithaca.edu; Drescher, Michael; School of Planning, University of Waterloo; Ostrom Workshop, Indiana University; mdresche@uwaterloo.ca; Dickinson, Stephanie L; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Indiana University; School of Public Health, Indiana University; sd3@indiana.edu; Knackmuhs, Eric G.; Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Studies, Indiana University; School of Public Health, Indiana University; Ostrom Workshop, Indiana University; eknackmu@indiana.edu.
As natural areas, agricultural lands, and open spaces continue to be developed at unprecedented rates, it is important for land conservation professionals to understand the individuals who might play a role in permanently protecting these lands and their ecological services. Many factors have been shown to influence land protection decisions among private owners, including land-use activities, demographic characteristics, and environmental intention and behavior. With the hypothesis that individuals already involved in land conservation programs would be candidates for permanent protection, we set out to model conservation easement decisions within a group of participants in southern Indiana’s Classified Forest and Wildlands Program (ICFWP)....
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports Palavras-chave: Conservation easements; Functional leisure; Indiana Classified Forest and Wildlands; Land trusts; Land use; Private land conservation.
Ano: 2016
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Networking for conservation: social capital and perceptions of organizational success among land trust boards Ecology and Society
Ruseva, Tatyana B.; Appalachian State University; rusevatb@appstate.edu; Farmer, James R.; Indiana University; jafarmer@indiana.edu; Chancellor, Charles; Clemson University; hchance@clemson.edu.
As an important component in collaborative natural resource management and nonprofit governance, social capital is expected to be related to variations in the performance of land trusts. Land trusts are charitable organizations that work to conserve private land locally, regionally, or nationally. The purpose of this paper is to identify the level of structural and cognitive social capital among local land trusts, and how these two types of social capital relate to the perceived success of land trusts. The analysis integrates data for land trusts operating in the U.S. south-central Appalachian region, which includes western North Carolina, southwest Virginia, and east Tennessee. We use factor analysis to elicit different dimensions of cognitive social...
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports Palavras-chave: Land conservation; Land trusts; Networks; Organizational success; Social capital.
Ano: 2016
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
The Conservation Contributions of Conservation Easements: Analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area Protected Lands Spatial Database Ecology and Society
Rissman, Adena R; University of California at Berkeley; arissman@nature.berkeley.edu; Merenlender, Adina M; University of California at Berkeley; adina@nature.berkeley.edu.
Conservation easements have emerged as an important tool for land trusts and government agencies aiming to conserve private land in the United States. Despite the increase in public investment in conservation easement acquisitions, little is known about their conservation outcomes, particularly at a landscape scale. The nine-county San Francisco Bay Area exemplifies a complex conservation context: 190 organizations hold 24% of the land base in some type of protection status. Using a detailed protected lands database, we compared the contributions of conservation easements and fee-simple protected areas to ecological, agricultural, and public recreation benefits. We found that conservation easements were more likely to conserve grasslands, oak woodlands,...
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports Palavras-chave: Conservation easements; Land trusts; Private land conservation; Protected areas; Protected area databases; Open space; Institutions; San Francisco Bay Area; Working landscapes; Recreation.
Ano: 2008
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
State-Level Variation in Land-Trust Abundance: Could It Make Economic Sense AgEcon
Albers, Heidi J.; Ando, Amy Whritenour.
Few economic analyses examine land trusts, their decisions, and the land-trust "industry," despite their growing importance. For example, statistics on the wide variation in the number of trusts in different regions of the United States raise questions about whether such variation makes economic sense. This paper builds a model to identify the optimal number of private conservation agents. The model depicts two competing forces: regional spatial externalities in conservation benefits that increase the efficiency of having fewer agents and organizational costs, and fund-raising specialization, which increases the efficiency of having more agents. Using state-level variables, we perform a count-data analysis of the number of trusts conserving land in each...
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper Palavras-chave: Land trusts; Public goods; Organizational size; Conservation benefits; U.S. land conservation; Land Economics/Use.
Ano: 2001 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/10873
Registros recuperados: 4
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional