|
|
|
|
|
Schaefer,Carl W.. |
Why are the subfamily relationships of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) important?-This question is really two: Is Triatominae a phylogenetically valid monophyletic subfamily; and, if it is, to what other reduviid subfamilies is it most closely related? If the answer to the first question is Yes, then what one knows about one member of Triatominae may be true for other members; if the answer is No, then no such prediction can be made. Because many members of Triatominae are of medical importance, such predictions are vitally (literally) important. For the same reason, knowledge of the subfamily relatives of medically important triatomines is important: For here too predictions about one related member can be based on knowledge of others. These points... |
Tipo: Info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Palavras-chave: Harpactocorinae; Linshcosteus; Phylogeny; Peiratinae; Reduviinae. |
Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0328-03812005000100002 |
| |
|
|
Morrone, J.J.; Coscarón, M. del C. |
Based on distributional data of 40 species of Peiratinae, historical relationships of five Amazonian areas (Paranaense, Atlantic, Pacific, Amazonian, and Cerrado) and two Chacoan areas (Chaco and Caatinga), were investigated through a parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE). The resulting area cladogram indicates the following sequence of area fragmentation: (Cerrado (Caatinga (Chaco, ((Pacific, Amazonian), (Atlantic, Paranaense))))). It is proposed that these results reflect the gradual development of a diagonal of open formations (Chaco-Cerrado-Caatinga), which separated the former continuous tropical forest into two parts, namely, northwestern (Pacific plus Amazonian) and southeastern (Paranaense plus Atlantic). |
Tipo: Article / Letter to the editor |
Palavras-chave: Heteroptera; Reduviidae; Peiratinae; Distribution; Patterns; Parsimony analysis; Endemicity; 42.75. |
Ano: 1996 |
URL: http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/record/318686 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|