Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Ordenar por: 

RelevânciaAutorTítuloAnoImprime registros no formato resumido
Registros recuperados: 6
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
An Empirical Analysis of Stakeholders’ Influence on Policy Development: the Role of Uncertainty Handling Ecology and Society
Bijlsma, Rianne M.; University of Twente, The Netherlands; Deltares, The Netherlands; r.m.bijlsma@alumnus.utwente.nl; Bots, Pieter W. G.; Cemagref (UMR G-EAU); University of Delft, The Netherlands; p.w.g.bots@tudelft.nl; Wolters, Henk A.; Deltares, The Netherlands; henk.wolters@deltares.nl; Hoekstra, Arjen Y.; University of Twente, The Netherlands; a.y.hoekstra@utwente.nl.
Stakeholder participation is advocated widely, but there is little structured, empirical research into its influence on policy development. We aim to further the insight into the characteristics of participatory policy development by comparing it to expert-based policy development for the same case. We describe the process of problem framing and analysis, as well as the knowledge base used. We apply an uncertainty perspective to reveal differences between the approaches and speculate about possible explanations. We view policy development as a continuous handling of substantive uncertainty and process uncertainty, and investigate how the methods of handling uncertainty of actors influence the policy development. Our findings suggest that the wider frame...
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports Palavras-chave: Environmental policy; Framing; Participation; Policy development; Policy process; Stakeholder involvement; Uncertainty.
Ano: 2011
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Supporting the Constructive Use of Existing Hydrological Models in Participatory Settings: a Set of “Rules of the Game” Ecology and Society
Bots, Pieter W. G.; Delft University of Technology; Cemagref; p.w.g.bots@tudelft.nl; Bijlsma, Rianne; Deltares; r.m.bijlsma@utwente.nl; von Korff, Yorck; Lisode; yorck.von-korff@lisode.com; Van der Fluit, Nicolien; Buro Natuur+Water; info@buronatuurpluswater.nl; Wolters, Henk; Deltares; henk.wolters@deltares.nl.
When hydrological models are used in support of water management decisions, stakeholders often contest these models because they perceive certain aspects to be inadequately addressed. A strongly contested model may be abandoned completely, even when stakeholders could potentially agree on the validity of part of the information it can produce. The development of a new model is costly, and the results may be contested again. We consider how existing hydrological models can be used in a policy process so as to benefit from both hydrological knowledge and the perspectives and local knowledge of stakeholders. We define a code of conduct as a set of “rules of the game” that we base on a case study of developing a water management plan for a...
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports Palavras-chave: Case study; Conflict; Hydrological model; Institutions; Netherlands; Participation; Policy process; Water management.
Ano: 2011
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE NATURE OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AgEcon
Crean, Jason; Pagan, Phil; Curthoys, Catherine.
The objectives of government in relation to natural resource management in agriculture have changed significantly over time. Similarly, the process that government employs to develop natural resource management policy has also evolved. In the past, policy has been developed centrally, while more recently there has been greater effort to involve the community in this process. There are clear linkages between changes in natural resource management objectives and changes in the policy development process. The implementation of the NSW Government’s Water Reforms is used as a case study to consider these linkages and to examine the advantages and disadvantages of moving to a more community based approach to natural resource management. The implications of this...
Tipo: Presentation Palavras-chave: Water reform; Natural resource management; Policy process; Role of economists; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy.
Ano: 1999 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/123797
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM IN THE POLICY PROCESS AgEcon
Bryden, John Marshall; Mittenzwei, Klaus.
B2_1
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Academic freedom; Policy process; Policy decision-making; Policy advice; Research; Research institute; Political Economy; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession.
Ano: 2010 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/93945
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Q-Squared in Policy: The Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods of Poverty Analysis in Decision-Making AgEcon
Shaffer, Paul; Kanbur, Ravi; Hang, Nguyen Thu; Aryeetey, Ellen Bortei-Doku.
This introductory essay for the journal Symposium presents an overview of issues related to ‘Q-Squared in Policy: the use of qualitative and quantitative methods of poverty analysis in decision-making’. We focus on issues raised on the supply side of data use, relating, inter alia to the informational content and policy usefulness of different types of data and analysis. These issues are grouped under the headings of: outcomes vs. processes, unpacking processes and thick and thin. We begin however, with a brief discussion of one aspect of the demand side, namely the politics of data use, given its centrality to the issues at hand.
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper Palavras-chave: Poverty; Methods; Mixed method research; Policy process; Methodological pluralism; Impact assessment; International Relations/Trade; Political Economy.
Ano: 2009 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/48919
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Subdividing the Commons: The Politics of Property Rights Transformation in Kenya’s Maasailand AgEcon
Mwangi, Esther.
This paper discusses the internal processes and decisions that characterized the transition from collectively held group ranches to individualized property systems among the Maasai pastoralists of Kajiado district in Kenya. It addresses the question of why group ranch members would demand individualized property systems, but then turn against the outcome. In addressing this puzzle the paper discusses the process of land allocation and distribution during group ranch subdivision. It examines who the main actors were during subdivision, their degree of latitude in crafting and changing rules, and the interactions between Maasai and state institutions. Findings suggest that, because the process by which property rights change is so intertwined with politics,...
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper Palavras-chave: Commons; Policy process; Property rights; Kenya; Land tenure; Pastoralism; Group ranches.
Ano: 2006 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/42510
Registros recuperados: 6
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional