|
|
|
|
|
Andrade, Gustavo S. M.; The University of Queensland, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; gsalgado.andrade@gmail.com; Rhodes, Jonathan R; The University of Queensland, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; j.rhodes@uq.edu.au. |
Many protected areas (PAs) have followed the conventional and exclusionary approach applied at Yellowstone in 1872. As such, many parks have failed to fully integrate other important factors, such as social, cultural, and political issues. In some cases, this has triggered adverse social impacts on local communities, disrupting their traditional ways of living and limiting their control of and access to natural resources. Such an outcome can undermine protection policies through conflicts between park managers and local communities. The success of conservation strategies through protected areas may lie in the ability of managers to reconcile biodiversity conservation goals with social and economic issues and to promote greater compliance of local... |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Community-based natural resource management; Compliance; Conservation; Empowerment; Participation; Protected area management; Stewardship. |
Ano: 2012 |
|
| |
|
|
Clement, Sarah; Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool ; Sarah.Clement@liverpool.ac.uk; Moore, Susan A; Environment and Conservation Sciences, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University; S.Moore@murdoch.edu.au; Lockwood, Michael; Geography and Spatial Sciences, School of Land and Food, University of Tasmania; Michael.Lockwood@utas.edu.au. |
Biodiversity loss is one of the most significant drivers of ecosystem change and is projected to continue at a rapid rate. While protected areas, such as national parks, are seen as important refuges for biodiversity, their effectiveness in stemming biodiversity decline has been questioned. Public agencies have a critical role in the governance of many such areas, but there are tensions between the need for these agencies to be more “adaptive” and their current operating environment. Our aim is to analyze how institutions enable or constrain capacity to conserve biodiversity in a globally significant cross-border network of protected areas, the Australian Alps. Using a novel conceptual framework for diagnosing biodiversity institutions,... |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive governance; Australian Alps; Biodiversity conservation; Capacity; Institutions; Protected area management. |
Ano: 2016 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Merenlender, Adina; University of California, Berkeley; adina@nature.berkeley.edu; Kremen, Claire; Center for Conservation Biology and Wildlife Conservation Society; ckremen@leland.Stanford.EDU; Rakotondratsima, Marius; Wildlife Conservation Society, Madagascar; mphrl@ukc.ac.uk; Weiss, Andrew; Center for Conservation Biology; aweiss@bing.stanford.edu. |
Monitoring the influence of human actions on flagship species is an important part of conserving biodiversity, because the information gained is crucial for the development and adaptation of conservation management plans. On the Masoala Peninsula in Madagascar, we are monitoring the two largest prosimian species, Eulemur fulvus albifrons and Varecia variegata rubra, at disturbed and undisturbed forest sites to determine if extraction of forest resources has a significant impact on the population viability of these species. To test the sensitivity of lemur species to routine extraction of natural resources by local villagers, we compared population demography and density for both species across six study sites, using a new census technique. Three of the... |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Biodiversity; Buffer zone; Census techniques; Conservation; Eulemur fulvus albifrons; GIS; Lemurs; Madagascar; National park; Natural resource extraction; Primate; Protected area management; Varecia variegata rubra. |
Ano: 1998 |
|
| |
|
|
Wittmer, Heidi; Birner, Regina. |
The present paper analyzes the role of discourse in conflicts concerning nature conservation in tropical countries. We focus on the contested question as to whether and to which extent local communities should be allowed to live and use resources inside protected areas. Applying the concepts of belief-systems, story-lines and discourse coalitions, we analyze two empirical case studies dealing with this conflict: The first case study is concerned with a policy process at the national level that aimed at passing a community forestry law in Thailand to make the establishment of community forests in protected areas possible. The second case study deals with the proposed resettlement of a village from the Lore Lindu National Park in Sulawesi, Indonesia. In both... |
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Discourse; Biodiversity conservation; Protected area management; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy. |
Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/42490 |
| |
|
|
|