|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 12 | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Anderies, John M; Arizona State University; m.anderies@asu.edu; Folke, Carl; Beijer Institute for Ecological Economics; Stockholm Resilience Center, Stockholm University; carl.folke@beijer.kva.se; Walker, Brian; CSIRO Ecosystem Science; Brian.Walker@csiro.au; Ostrom, Elinor; Indiana University; ostrom@indiana.edu. |
| Globalization, the process by which local social-ecological systems (SESs) are becoming linked in a global network, presents policy scientists and practitioners with unique and difficult challenges. Although local SESs can be extremely complex, when they become more tightly linked in the global system, complexity increases very rapidly as multi-scale and multi-level processes become more important. Here, we argue that addressing these multi-scale and multi-level challenges requires a collection of theories and models. We suggest that the conceptual domains of sustainability, resilience, and robustness provide a sufficiently rich collection of theories and models, but overlapping definitions and confusion about how these conceptual domains articulate with... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Fragility; Global change; Governance; Institutions; Resilience; Robustness; Sustainability. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Barnett, Allain J. ; Arizona State University; ajbarnet@asu.edu; Anderies, John M; Arizona State University; m.anderies@asu.edu. |
| The insights in Governing the Commons have provided foundational ideas for commons research in the past 23 years. However, the cases that Elinor Ostrom analyzed have been exposed to new social, economic, and ecological disturbances. What has happened to these cases since the 1980s? We reevaluated one of Ostrom’s case studies, the lobster and groundfishery of Port Lameron, Southwest Nova Scotia (SWNS). Ostrom suggested that the self-governance of this fishery was fragile because the government did not recognize the rights of resource users to organize their own rules. In the Maine lobster fishery, however, the government formalized customary rules and decentralized power to fishing ports. We applied the concepts of feedback, governance... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Atlantic Canada; Collective choice; Institutional analysis; Lobster; Maine; Polycentricity; Robustness. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
| Yu, David J.; School of Sustainability, Arizona State University; Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University; davidjae@asu.edu; Anderies, John M.; Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University; School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University; School of Sustainability, Arizona State University; m.anderies@asu.edu; Lee, Dowon; Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University; leedw@snu.ac.kr; Perez, Irene; Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University; iperezib@asu.edu. |
| The context in which many self-governed commons systems operate will likely be significantly altered as globalization processes play out over the next few decades. Such dramatic changes will induce some systems to fail and subsequently to be transformed, rather than merely adapt. Despite this possibility, research on globalization-induced transformations of social-ecological systems (SESs) is still underdeveloped. We seek to help fill this gap by exploring some patterns of transformation in SESs and the question of what factors help explain the persistence of cooperation in the use of common-pool resources through transformative change. Through the analysis of 89 forest commons in South Korea that experienced such transformations, we found that there are... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Collective action; Community-based forest management; Forest commons; Multilevel governance; Nested enterprise; Network diversity; Robustness; Robustness trade-offs; Social-ecological systems; Songgye; Transformative capacity of social-ecological systems. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
| Fleischman, Forrest D.; Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University; fleischf@indiana.edu; Boenning, Kinga; Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO); k.boenning@googlemail.com; Garcia-Lopez, Gustavo A; Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University; ggarcial@indiana.edu; Mincey, Sarah; Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University; skmincey@indiana.edu; Schmitt-Harsh, Mikaela; Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University; Schmittm@indiana.edu; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Facultad de Estudios Ambientales y Rurales, Universidad Javeriana; mclopezperez@gmail.com; Basurto, Xavier; Duke University Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University; xavier.basurto@duke.edu; Fischer, Burney; Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University; bufische@indiana.edu; Ostrom, Elinor; Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University; ostrom@indiana.edu. |
| We develop an analytic framework for the analysis of robustness in social-ecological systems (SESs) over time. We argue that social robustness is affected by the disturbances that communities face and the way they respond to them. Using Ostrom's ontological framework for SESs, we classify the major factors influencing the disturbances and responses faced by five Indiana intentional communities over a 15-year time frame. Our empirical results indicate that operational and collective-choice rules, leadership and entrepreneurship, monitoring and sanctioning, economic values, number of users, and norms/social capital are key variables that need to be at the core of future theoretical work on robustness of self-organized systems. |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Disturbance; Intentional communities; Response; Robustness; Social-ecological systems. |
| Ano: 2010 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Registros recuperados: 12 | |
|
|
|
